Perhaps the answer is more interesting than yes or no.
Screen time gets blamed for a lot.
We are often encouraged to put our phones down, spend less
time gaming and get back to the “real world”. And sometimes that may be exactly
what we need.
But games are also places where people explore, solve
problems, connect, create, make choices, fail safely and try again.
We play for all kinds of reasons:
For challenge. For connection. For escape. For curiosity.
For fun. Or simply because we're bored.
Research into games and emotional wellbeing is growing, and
some findings are promising. Studies have explored whether games may support
relaxation, reduce stress and anxiety, encourage social connection, or make
wellbeing experiences more engaging.
But the evidence does not give us a neat “gaming is good
for you” conclusion. Different games, different players and different
reasons for playing can create very different experiences.
So perhaps the more interesting question isn't whether games
are simply good or bad for emotional wellbeing.
What happens while we play and can any of it matter after
we stop?
Can Games Give Our Minds Somewhere Else to Go?
After a difficult day, the last thing we may want is another
task demanding our attention.
A game can offer somewhere different to focus.
For a while, the problem in front of us isn't tomorrow's
deadline, the argument we keep replaying, or the twenty things still waiting on
the to-do list.
It might simply be:
How on earth do I get through this maze?
Research suggests that some commercial video games may help
reduce stress and anxiety. But that doesn't make gaming an automatic “stress reliever”. The game, the player and the circumstances all matter.
Perhaps play simply gives our attention somewhere else to
go for a while.
It can also give us small, clear moments of progress: a
puzzle finally makes sense, a hidden path opens, something we've tried
repeatedly suddenly works.
There is satisfaction in that.
But a game doesn't have to transform our emotional state to
justify the time we choose to spend there.
Fun is allowed to be fun.
Can Games Help Us Connect?
Games can give friends, families, colleagues and complete
strangers something to solve, explore or laugh about together; even when they
cannot physically be in the same room.
That doesn't mean playing with others automatically cures
loneliness or creates lasting friendships.
The value may simply lie in the opportunity for
connection: a shared challenge, a ridiculous failure, an unexpected victory
or something to talk about afterwards.
The game may end. The conversation doesn't have to.
Can Games Make Us Think?
This is where I become particularly curious.
Games expect us to make choices.
Which path?
Which character do I trust?
Do I investigate the strange noise, or very sensibly walk
in the opposite direction?
But what interests me isn't only what happens during
the game.
It's what happens afterwards.
Perhaps hours later, while making coffee, a choice comes
back to mind:
Why did I do that?
Perhaps an encounter returns a few days later.
Or perhaps nothing follows us at all.
Not every game needs to become a profound life lesson.
But what happens when play creates an opportunity for
reflection?
Does Gamification Automatically Make Something Good for
Us?
No.
Points, levels, rewards, badges, streaks and collectables
can make an experience more engaging.
But engagement and wellbeing are not the same thing.
A systematic review of gamification in mental-health and wellbeing technologies found that promoting engagement was one of the main
reasons researchers used gamification. It also raised concerns that
gamification can be treated as a “black box”, without enough consideration of
the mechanisms through which particular game elements may create value.
Someone returning to an app tells us they returned, but not
whether their wellbeing improved.
And attaching points to a wellbeing activity doesn't
magically make it meaningful.
The mechanics should serve the experience, not become the
experience.
What Happens When Play Meets Reflection?
This question has become particularly interesting to me
while developing Prism Paths.
Prism Paths explores whether journaling and reflection can
exist differently inside a playable experience; where curiosity, exploration,
narrative and choice create opportunities to reflect.
But building something intended to support emotional
wellbeing doesn't mean we already know what players will take from it.
We won't know until they experience it for themselves.
And not everyone will want to.
Some people love games. Others avoid them. Some already
journal; others cannot imagine why anyone would want to.
You don't have to be convinced to be curious.
We begin with an idea.
Then we stay curious enough to discover what actually
happens.
Can Games Improve Emotional Well-Being?
Maybe.
And maybe is far more interesting than I initially
realised.
Research gives us reasons to keep exploring the relationship
between games and wellbeing—and reasons to be careful about simple answers.
For example, a large Oxford study involving about 39,000
adult players found little evidence that time spent gaming itself caused
changes in wellbeing. The researchers found that motivations for playing may
matter more.
A game may give our attention somewhere else to go.
It may create opportunities for connection, curiosity or
reflection.
Or... we may simply enjoy playing.
That matters too.
There is still a lot we don't know about what can happen
when play, reflection and emotional wellbeing meet.
Maybe that's exactly why it's worth exploring.
Curious Where This Leads?
Prism Paths is moving towards its first playable MVP.
You don't have to agree with the idea to watch what
happens.
Follow the journey, or, if you'd like to experience Prism
Paths for yourself, join the early-access list.
